I’m excruciatingly ticklish. I’d rather be tortured than tickled. Ticking is torture. It’s nothing short of child abuse.

I realize this makes me an outlier. Few people really enjoy being tickled, but even fewer would call it torture.

My father loved to wrestle around with us on the floor. He and my brother even had one of those amateur cirque du living room routines where my father would lie on his back, legs perpendicular to the ground, and my brother would stand, balancing on my father’s feet. Or maybe they just did an airplane thing. Whatever it was, I wanted no part of it because invariably there would be a knock – an audible knock on a wall or piece of furniture – my father would make to signal to us that The Claw was approaching. He’d pin one of us down with his legs and position The Claw high over our heads so we could watch it descend on us in horror movie slow-motion. My brother thought it was awesome, but I hated it so much I’d cry, scream, scream some more, temporarily lose the ability to take air into my lungs and then, when finally released, run screaming up to my room wherein those two assholes my male family members would laugh and actually ask, “Hey, where are you going?”

As horrific as that was, that might be preferable to these Claws:

AlexanderMcQueenShoesI remember my reaction to Uggs when I first saw them back in the early Aughties. I thought those were the ugliest things I’d ever seen, but I certainly didn’t worry they’d give me nightmares. These freakish things already have.

What the fug are they? And better yet, WHY the fug are they?

These … these … cloven instruments of sartorial torture were part of Alexander McQueen’s spring/summer 2010 show and fashion bloggers can’t shut up about them. They all wanted to know when Lady Gaga would wear them. (Oh! Squee!)

Ask and you shall receive, Gagettes:
LadyGaga_AlexanderMcQueenShoesWhat I want to know is, just how many of these lobster-claw-meets-pointe-shoes things are in production? Were only a few pairs made, like most of the don’t-worry-we-don’t-really-expect-any-of-you-to-WEAR-these costumes that appear on couture runways, or will this style trickle down and a year from now we’ll all be wearing the Nine West version?

I wouldn’t normally wonder if something that appeared in a Lady Gaga video would soon be coming to a preschool drop-off and pick-up near me, but then the once august, now desperately clinging to relevancy New York Times Magazine has called the armadillos, as McQueen himself referred to them, one of greatest ideas in the Ninth Annual Year of Ideas.

Picture 2I don’t know if the armadillos qualify as an idea, an original notion that did not exist until it was born in a great thinker’s mind. At least not in the same way banning cul-de-sacs in the interest of better suburban planning and the discovery that cows that are named produce more milk are fascinating ideas.

I know a desperate grab at edginess when I see it. Still, I see them, the claws. I keep seeing them, moving. Waving back and forth. But not on someone’s wine-stem-skinny legs. On their hands.

Like the waiters in the background in that scene in at the seafood restaurant in “My Best Friend’s Wedding”! (1:49 and again at 1:58)


I liked that movie more than I thought I would, its earnestness and the fact that the Julia Roberts character got hers but good for being such a conniving bitch. Will any of us say the same about “Eat, Pray, Love,” though? I don’t think I could have come up with a worse choice than Julia Roberts in that role. I picture a much shorter woman learning Italian, meditating in an ashram and listening to some Yoda-like guy spout Balinese wisdom.

Have you seen Rupert Everett lately? He’s now most often seen on bad plastic surgery Web sites, after Burt Reynolds but before Kenny Rogers:
rupert1I’m going to have to disagree with you on the “impressive” there, Dr. Glatt.

What’s Rupert Everett been doing lately, I wondered. Poking around, I found that he’s over America, much like Gwyneth is:
Picture 3Yeah. He’s probably right. We relied on “Sex and the City” for our cultural references for way too long. And it won’t be ending any time soon because there’s another of these damn movies coming next year. Wonder if Carrie will be wearing armadillos in the sequel? Hmm, hmm? Or that Sea of Shoes Jane Aldridge gal? She lives for strange-looking booties.

There will be an entire episode dedicated to them in the next season of “The Rachel Zoe Project.” She’ll tell everyone they’re so tall they exacerbate her vertigo. But she won’t take them off. Then she’ll get a nose bleed.

I die.

I don’t think they look like armadillos, really. But who am I to say? I’m not the one who spent hours sketching and envisioning them into fruition as McQueen did. To me, they look like lobster claws. Like the old married lobsters that Phoebe so lovingly taught us about (0:43 and 1:35):


But do you know what I really think of when I think of The Claws? Those cheesy biscuits at Red Lobster! Can I get an amen on this one? They’re probably a trans fat nightmare but they are yummy. I’m going to All Recipes now to look for a recipe.

As I do, enjoy the campiest song from the campiest musical outfit on this or any planet (including Planet Claire):

{ 4 comments }

P1070119I never saw a little girl in a bishop dress until I moved here.

They’re just not worn in the North. No one puts their boys in John-Johns, either. I was unaware that those were even manufactured after 1963.

Upstate New York, where I’m from, is too steeped in its ethnic and working-class roots for that sort of frippery (albeit adorable frippery). The children’s aesthetic there is far more utilitarian. For “dressy” occasions (holidays, school pictures, church twice a year), all the kids are dressed like they go to Catholic school (khakis, button-downs; jumpers for girls), whether or not they do. Otherwise it’s jeans and sneakers. Gap Kids is as fancy as it gets.

After I moved, I thought about hiding my clothes so my mother didn’t donate my mostly black wardrobe to some color-blind homeless woman. I had to get used to all the color that surrounded me, even before stepping into a children’s boutique. I was surprised a city of this size had so many, but now I see it’s par for the course here in the South.

Boring, practical ol’ me just could not see the sense of buying bishops for my 9-month-old daughter. I was certainly no expert, but don’t they crawl before they walk? Who can crawl in a dress? And apparently the boutiques don’t let you leave with the clothes – they have to be sent out to be monogrammed first.

I understood why “precious” is the most-used adjective describing children down here. They were precious because they were dressed precious. (Or were they dressed precious because they were precious? Who can say?)

(Seriously, I love my new home and I don’t mean to make fun. But I gotta tell you non-Southerners this: You can even find bishops with Clemson tiger paws and South Carolina gamecocks on them. I shit you not.)

I knew that by eschewing the prevailing style I’d be dressing my child like an outsider, but I was willing to take that stand in the name of frugality. We hoped (and still do) to add another daughter to the family, so embroidery was out. Unless I put Tink’s last initial on everything, but I didn’t want to have to spend all my time correcting people who called her Laverne.

Instead I chose hardy knits that allowed her to jump and run. And now I’ve got a girl whose dolls collect dust but who can identify such superheroes as Mighty Thor, Punisher and Juggernaut. Precious indeed.

I’m not immune to the pressure – real or imagined – to dress my daughter a little more girly. She’s got a bishop or two in her closet, and she looks like an angel in them, with their fluttery little sleeve caps. The bishops aren’t the problem. It’s the pair of Christmas socks I bought that make me want to hang my edgy Yankee head in shame.

I picked them up at one of the aforementioned children’s boutiques in town, this one on the tony Augusta Road, in the Old Money section of town. Not one of the children’s shops near my house, on the East side, where the New Money types and Newcomers From the Northeast reside. Anyway, I purchased something for Tink and at the counter I saw the socks– white cotton socks with Ho! Ho! embroidered in red. They weren’t “me,” but they would match the (plain, non-floral, solid-color, no-rickrack-ruffles-or-ribbons) dress I bought Tink for her first Christmas as a captialist.

Something seemed funny about the total, but rather than say anything, I handed over my debit card. But once I got in the car, I rifled the bag for the receipt only to find that the socks I thought were $2.50 were actually $12.50.

I sat in my car like a dope for several minutes. … Do I take them back in like any normal person would and say, “Had I known, I would never pay $12.50 for a pair of socks for an 18-month-old”? Or were they just so precious and would look so great with her outfit that they were worth the splurge? Rather than risk being the first person to return something in this store’s history because something was too expensive, I of course took them home.

And they were, the most goddamn precious socks ever to cover a child’s feet. It didn’t hurt that she wore them with a pair of red Chinese slippers, the whole effect a symbolic marriage of East and West; a secular greeting rooted in the two-millennia-old celebration of the Messiah paired with dragons representing a dynasty from the oldest continuous civilization on Earth; yin and yang. All there on her fat, wide feet.

Have I told you how wide this kid’s feet are? Still, at 4 years old, her feet are almost as wide as they are long. Her toes are so naturally splayed she will never need those toe separators when she gets pedicures. And yet! The Christmas socks still fit!

P1090635 This will be the fourth year for the Christmas socks. They were featured in last year’s Christmas card photo. I like them with jeans. I think it’s even more ironic to pair them with her rugged Keens. Precious, maybe. But never prissy.

On the next edition of “Sartorial Concessions to the South”: The Time I Walked into a Lilly Pulitzer Store and Burnt My Retinas.

{ 7 comments }

tigerwoods1 1. So! Just which Black Friday sale was he heading to at 2:25 a.m.? Was he rushing to get to a Tanger Outlet mall that already opened at midnight or was he going all-American and making his first stop at Walmart?

2. Oh, it looks like it was Zales. Since most of us enjoy a nice piece of jewelry and we’ve all had our steer wander into another cow’s clover patch, this is a question to seriously ponder: Ladies, would you even wear a Kobe Special? A ring purchased when your man was still wearing the fetid reek of opportunistic vagine? Why not just have a T printed to announce it is YOU who is the cheap whore whose acquiescence can bought for the price of two Masters wins and a Dubai Desert Classic?

3. I think I’d rather have this Kobe special, wouldn’t you?
Picture 1

4. I’m no master of public relations, but even I wonder if the best way to declare your innocence is to promptly hire Gloria Freaking Allred?

5. Is it heartless to cast aspersions at a woman who lost her fiance in the Sept. 11 attacks?

6. I mean, is there some sort of code of the sisterhood I’m breaking here? Maybe we should ask Gloria Allred, since the word “feminist” has been surgically attached to her name, as in “feminist lawyer Gloria Allred.” What does that actually mean? How does repping Paula Jones, Amber Frey and Rob Lowe’s nanny – plucky young things who tried to trade up the best way they knew how, in the sack – make one a feminist? I suppose by defending a woman’s right to get involved with dirtbags. Way to answer your own question, Eliz.

7. I take it back. Anyone who’s ever said in an interview “Although I’ve been romantically linked to a famous baseball player, a Broadway star, a musician, and various film and television actors, I will never kiss and tell!” is fair game. Am I right?

Picture 2 8. Is Uchitel’s assertion that she takes “customer service to a whole new level” low-hanging fruit that a blogger of my calibre wouldn’t touch?

9. Her last name looks hard to pronounce. Can we just all agree to call her Urkel?

10. What kind of clients does a Manhattan nightclub hostess have? In Australia?

11. Seriously. Clients?

12. Isn’t the real creep that Swedish golfer Jesper Parnevik for employing both Elin and her twin sister Josefin as nannies?

13. Where did Elin even see a National Enquirer – at the salon? Or does one of the domestic staff subscribe?

14. Does Tiger REALLY think posting “This situation is my fault … I will certainly make sure this doesn’t happen again” on his Web site after stonewalling the Florida Highway Patrol for the third day will put this whole thing to rest?

15. Who has mismanaged this situation worse – Tiger or Mark Steinberg, his agent at IMG? With Tiger’s squeaky-clean image, Steinberg’s job hasn’t involved much heavy lifting so far. Guess he was caught asleep at the wheel.

16. About that stonewalling. Is this about the rumors of pain killers? Or avoiding a domestic violence charge against Elin?

17. As much as it pains me to see clean-cut Tiger Woods now in the same league as David Letterman, Brad Pitt and Hugh Grant, I feel worse for Elin once the Lorena Bobbit, Tawny Kitaen and Liza Minnelli comparisons start. I guess there’s no real question here.

charlie-woods-tiger-woods-son-pictures 18. Any chance that the public will love Tiger more for making a mistake? Will this make the perfect robot golfer married to the perfect former Swedish model and their two perfect children seem more human and less, you know, perfect?

19. How did Elin plan on explaining all the smashed windows? Was the SUV on fire? The airbags hadn’t deployed; I don’t even think the hydrant was knocked over. At some point didn’t she have that out of body experience and get a chance to ask herself, “Whoa! What’s happening here?”? Did she just ignore the voice in her head telling her to dial down the crazy?

20. Was Shaq awakened by all the tire squealing and glass shattering?

21. So ……. what was it? Putter or driver?

Read the day’s other lists over at Anna’s:
listbutton

{ 4 comments }